U.S. Antitrust Agencies Increase Merger Scrutiny: Challenge Small, and Even Consummated, Mergers
|
|
Rating 0/5 [0 Votes]
|
Print |
E-mail |
|
|
Over the past two years, U.S. antitrust agencies have challenged several mergers that fell well below the $63.4 million Hart-Scott-Rodino reporting threshold. While the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission always have had the power to challenge such transactions, the agencies have exercised that power more frequently in recent years.
Experts attribute the rise in challenges to the slow merger market,
improved monitoring capabilities, and a more aggressive enforcement
position by the agencies in general.
Similarly, in recent months, the FTC has increased its
challenges of consummated mergers, including ordering companies to
unravel already combined companies from past mergers that it deemed
anticompetitive. Since that start of the 2009 fiscal year, the FTC
has challenged seven consummated transactions. In contrast, the FTC
averaged one such challenge a year during the previous five
years.
Former CEO Found Guilty of Conspiracy to Obstruct
Justice
On July 27, 2010, a federal jury found Ian Norris, the ex-CEO of
Morgan Crucible Co. PLC, a United Kingdom corporation, guilty of
conspiring to obstruct justice during a grand jury investigation of
price-fixing charges. According to a DOJ press release, the count carries a maximum
penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Although
Norris was indicted on one count of price fixing, along with three
obstruction-related counts, he was not tried for price fixing. In
2007, the British House of Lords ruled that Norris could not be
extradited on the price-fixing count alone because the conduct
alleged in connection with that count did not amount to a crime
under U.K. law at the time it allegedly was committed. U.S.
prosecutors pursued the conspiracy and obstruction counts, however,
and the U.K. Supreme Court ultimately agreed that Norris could be
extradited on those charges.
Draft Regulations Show China Getting Tougher on Price
Fixing
China's National Development and Reform Commission has
released for public comment new draft regulations—called
the "Special Regulations on Penalties for Unlawful Practices
Committed during the Periods of Abnormal Fluctuation of Market
Price"—that will give the NDRC the power to respond
quickly to suspected price fixing. Among other things, the
regulations would allow the NDRC to fine individuals for antitrust
violations. Under China's current law, only businesses can be
fined. Other provisions of the draft regulations would allow the
NDRC to confiscate illegal profits and, in serious cases, the NDRC
would have the power to revoke a company's business license,
without which a company cannot trade legally in China.
ESA Finds Abusive Exclusivity Agreements and Imposes
First Competition Law Fine
On July 14, 2010, the EFTA Surveillance Authority, the
equivalent of the European Commission for Norway, Iceland and
Liechtenstein, handed down its first ever competition law fine. The
case serves as a reminder that a network of exclusivity agreements
can give rise to abuse of dominant position charges. Additional
information is available in our
August 2010 EU/UK Competition Law Newsletter